Q in Context II

For the right understanding of the Sayings Source Q not only the relation to early Judaism but also the social "landscape" in which the texts evolved is undeniably crucial. Here results of Galilean Archeology are brought into contact with sociological models how Jesus and the Q-community might have interacted with their contemporaries (cf. the thesis of social disruption by G. Theißen, attitudes in early Judaism towards the Temple by B. Ego, the role of women in early Judaism by T. Ilan, the situation in the Diaspora by P. Trebilco). The question is also extended to the social profile of the authorities behind the Sayings Source Q: Were they itinerant prophets or village scribes?



Dr. theol. Markus Tiwald ist Professor für

Neutestamentliche Bibelwissenschaft an der Universität Wien.



In this voume, results of Galilean Archeology are brought into contact with sociological models how Jesus and the Q-community might have interacted with their contemporaries. The question is also extended to the social profile of the authorities behind the Sayings Source Q: Were they itinerant prophets or village scribes?The volume is part II to the book “Q in Context I. The Separation between the Just and the Unjust in Early Judaism and in the Sayings Source / Die Scheidung zwischen Gerechten und Ungerechten in Frühjudentum und Logienquelle” (ISBN 978-3-8471-0322-6).